Select Page

Sex Stories: Misconceived Prenatal Drug Use Bill Targets Tennessee Moms

Tennessee may become the first state to prosecute new mothers for illegal drug use during pregnancy if such use results in either addiction or harm of their newborn. At first blush, SB 1391 does little more than amend the state’s current fetal homicide law. Yet this very amendment—one that allows women who have pregnancy complications after using drugs to be charged with crimes ranging from a misdemeanor to aggravated assault—could see new moms slammed with up to 15 years in prison. The proposal, which easily passed through both chambers of Tennessee’s legislature, now awaits the signature or veto of Gov. Bill Haslam.

Other states have sought similar legislation have abandoned it due to the scientific evidence showing that such interventions actually put babies in harm’s way. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is unequivocal on this issue, stating that, “Seeking obstetric–gynecologic care should not expose a woman to criminal or civil penalties.” Incarceration, or the threat of it, simply does not reduce drug or alcohol use. Instead, it can discourage pregnant women from seeking prenatal care. This, in turn, may deny these women the opportunity to receive evidence-based interventions via their healthcare provider.

Nevertheless, many states criminalize prenatal substance abuse to some degree; for example, by classifying it as a form of child abuse.

But before we examine all the ways this bill could go wrong, let’s put on our social justice hats and assume some good intentions. Why does this bill, and other statutes similar to it, even exist? Supporters of such legal interventions hope they will reduce the number of children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), which is associated with numerous negative birth outcomes, including birth defects, low birth weight, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). But the prevention by criminalization approach fails to take into account the complex nature of addiction, and the scarcity of addiction treatment options for pregnant drug users. A recent report from the Guttmacher Institute shows that few states have programs or protections in place for pregnant women seeking addiction treatment:

  • 18 states have targeted programs
  • 10 states give pregnant women priority access to state-funded programs
  • 4 states protect pregnant women from discrimination in general programs.

SB 1391 offers clemency to pregnant addicts if they enroll in a recovery program before giving birth, remain in the program after delivery, and successfully complete it. Although Guttmacher lists Tennessee as one of the 10 states that give priority access to state-funded treatment programs, this alone does not guarantee that a woman seeking treatment can receive it, and thus even have a chance of being safe from prosecution.

Given the science showing both that penalizing women doesn’t work, and that addiction is a physiological, psychological, and genetic phenomenon, it would make more sense to focus on making drug treatment more available to pregnant women.

It is worth mentioning here, of course, that drug use does not occur within a bubble. The ecological factors associated with drug use virtually guarantees that the law would disproportionately affect minorities and the poor. RH Reality Check provides a fantastic in-depth analysis of how SB 1391 would affect black women the most:

“Certainly SB 1391 does not target Black women specifically, just as none of the laws that were enacted in states across the country in the wake of the ‘crack baby’ media hysteria did. However, history tells us that laws that do not specifically target people of color nevertheless tend to disparately affect people of color.”

Because of its wording, SB 1391 could subject any women with a poor pregnancy outcome to an investigation. Given that such outcomes occur disproportionately among poor women and minorities, the law essentially becomes a form of legal discrimination. For example, only two of Tennessee’s addiction recovery centers offer on-site prenatal care. For women without reliable transportation, even acceptance into this program would not necessarily be their saving grace.

Gov. Haslam has a few more days to decide whether he’ll sign this bill into law. In the meantime, civil liberties, health, and women’s rights groups are actively campaigning against it. Be sure to check back next week for more details on the outcome.

Other Sexual Health News This Week

A federal judge in Oregon will hear arguments about the state’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage. (Huffington Post)

Brown University is being criticized for its handling of an on-campus rape case. (Brown Daily Herald)

The Y chromosome may be more important than originally thought. (New York Times)

One Virginia county may be losing its sex education teachers. (Washington Post)

Mississippi’s governor signed a law that bans abortion after 18 weeks gestation (20 weeks from a woman’s last period). (Washington Times)

A national infertility association graded each state on the availability of infertility care. (RH Reality Check)

A new study takes a more nuanced look at sex trafficking. (Slate)

Sex Stories: Week in Review, 4/4/14

Sexual Health Rankings presents Sex Stories, a weekly roundup of sexual health news from around the country.

Mississippi Passes Controversial Religious Freedom Law (Time)

Mississippi residents may soon be able to sue over laws that “impinge on their religious freedoms.” Opponents of the law worry it will be used to discriminate against LGBTQ individuals. The Governor, a supporter of the bill has yet to sign it. The bill also adds the phrase, “In God We Trust” to the state flag.

Mississippi Governor to Sign Bill Banning Abortion at 20 Weeks (Fox News)

Mississippi will soon join a number of states that ban abortion at 20 weeks. The law, which the Governor expressed eagerness to sign, makes an exception for women who face death or injury and in cases of severe fetal abnormality. It is expected that someone will file a legal challenge. Opponents feel that the ban will affect poor women while supporters argue the unborn child is of higher concern.

Utah Bans ‘Revenge Porn’ (Daily Mail)

Utah is the sixth state to pass laws criminalizing “revenge porn” or sexually explicit images published with intent to cause emotional stress or harm. The law has been criticized because its requirement for harmful intent leaves leaves a loophole for webmasters and others who post such content for other reasons such as income.

Statins Found to Improve Erectile Function (Fox News)

A new review of 11 randomized control trials examining erectile dysfunction (ED) and statin use found that such medications may have benefits beyond treating heart disease. Statins were associated with significantly higher scores on the International Inventory of Erectile Function. Such results further suggest the connection between overall health and sexual function.

Marriage May Help Keep Your Heart Healthy: Large US Study Links Vows to Lower Risk of Cardiovascular Illness (National Post)

A study of over 3.5 million people in the US found that married individuals have a lower risk of any type of heart or blood vessel problem. Such results were true regardless of age, gender, and other risk factors. This may be the result of having a spouse who encourages them to take care of themselves. It is important to note that most participants were white and female which can skew the results.

Harvard Student Who Claims On-Campus Assault Slams University Policies (ABC News)

Old policies have once again put Harvard at the center of the college sexual assault controversy. A survivor recently wrote an op-ed in the school’s newspaper accusing college officials of not providing an adequate response to the assault. The case speaks to the larger issues of rape culture and a lack of training for college officials on how to deal with sexual violence.

SC House: Sex-ed Classes Should be Medically Accurate, Not Just Focusing on Abstinence (The State)

As part of an effort to update South Carolina’s health and sex education laws, a House committee voted that all health information taught in schools must be medically accurate. The bill also requires sex-ed teachers to be certified in health and enforces stricter reporting to both the state and parents. Compromises, including removing language on sex outside of marriage, were removed in an effort to get the bill through.