Select Page

Colleges Vie for Sexual Health Title

Sex Stories

By Kait Scalisi, MPH

It’s that time of year again—pumpkin spice, homecoming, and the release of Trojan’s Sexual Health Report Card. The annual ranking of campus sexual health resources has become a fall tradition, and schools are stepping up their game in pursuit of the coveted No. 1 spot.

The report card provides valuable feedback about what schools do well, identifies where they could do better, and spurs improvement through competition. According to lead researcher Bert Sperling,

“The outside focus and attention placed on these programs has prompted schools to develop stronger sexual health initiatives and increase students’ access to resources.”

The report card ranks sexual health resources and information available to students on 140 campuses. Colleges are ranked on 11 categories including STI testing on-site, sexual violence prevention and response resources, and programming for sexual health education. To obtain this information, researchers both interview health center representatives and conduct their own research on the centers and their services.

Since the rankings began, schools have made vast improvements to the resources and information available to students. This year, the superstar is Oregon State University which went from No. 26 to No. 1. This incredible jump is due to factors like increasing condom availability, extending student health center hours of operations, and improving the usability and quality of their sexual health Web site. All of these factors reduce barriers to accessing safer sex materials and sexual health care. Other schools that saw large jumps in the rankings include the University of Oregon, recognized for its development of the SexPositive app, the University of Central Florida, and the University of Maryland. Coming in last, for the third year in a row, is Brigham Young University.

One limitation of the report card is that it only draws from schools in conferences within the Bowl Championships Series. That being said, the students on these campuses include individuals from all 50 states. Additionally, the report card only looks at resources available via student health centers, which may or may not be the main provider of sexual health services and information at a given school.

Despite such limitations, the Trojan report card provides valuable information about the types of resources and information available to students on campuses throughout the country, and it serves as a best-practices guide of sorts for other campuses, regardless of whether they are ranked. This year’s shakeup in the rankings highlights the increasing importance of sexual health issues to colleges and universities, and shows that lower-ranking schools can rise to the top by taking steps to improve.

Other Sexual Health News This Week

‘Swingers’ Multiple Drug Use Heightens Risk of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (Medical Press)

Transgender Federal Employee Wins Historic Discrimination Case (Washington Post)

Three States Wage Fight to Keep Same-Sex Marriage Bans (The Kansas City Star)

Planned Parenthood Thinks It Found a Way to Stop Middle Schoolers from Having Sex (Time)

Important Dates

The following conference proposals are due in October and November.

International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health (ISSWSH) 2015 Meeting, October 30.

CatalystCon East, November 4.

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) 2015 Conference, November 5.

Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium, November 7.

Making Strides in LGBT Patient-Centered Care

Sex Stories

By Kait Scalisi, MPH

A new report from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) highlights the huge strides healthcare facilities have made in LGBT patient-centered care while also showing the need for more inclusive policies and practices and increased staff training. The report, called the Healthcare Equality Index (HEI), rates facilities on how they treat LGBT individuals, commends hospitals that show commitment to LGBT patient-centered care, and provide resources and information to facilities looking to become more equitable and inclusive. In their words:

[…] the HEI offers healthcare facilities unique and powerful resources for providing a long overlooked group of patients the care that everyone deserves — while also complying with new regulatory requirements and gaining access to high-quality staff training.

The ratings are based on four core criteria. These include:

  1. A patient non-discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation and gender identity and is communicated in at least two accessible ways.
  2. Visitation policies that are equal for LGBT patients and visitor snad are communicated in at least two accessible ways.
  3. An employment non-discrimination policy that follows the guidelines for patients.
  4. Training in LGBT patient-centered care.

“Accessible” forms of communication include being posted on the facility’s website, in materials given to the patient at registration or other times, posted in the waiting room or in materials located there.

This year, there were 31 other questions that participating facilities answered. These “additional best practices” further gauged facilities’ engagement and interest in recommendations for optimal care. Questions were asked about facilities’ current and planned non-clinical plans in these areas.

2014 was the largest HEI ever, including data from over 1,500 healthcare facilities. Of these, about one-third (500) actively participated by responding to the HRC’s request for information and answering questions in the aforementioned 35 areas. This number is nearly double the response received in 2013, showing a huge growth in facilities’ commitment to meeting the unique needs of LGBT individuals. Information from the remaining 1,000 facilities was gotten either through researching hospital policy or reviewing results from the 2012 and 2013 HEI.

Unsurprisingly, actively participating facilities were more likely to meet each of the core criteria, with 84% meeting all of them and earning the status of “2014 leader in LGBT healthcare equality.” All but two states, Idaho and North Dakota, had at least one “equality leader.” Additionally, 10,000 hospital and clinic staff received training in at least one aspect of LGBT health. Alongside the official news that the federal government will recognize same-sex marriage in seven new states, this data shows that the US is becoming increasingly inclusive of and, hopefully, compassionate towards LGBT individuals.

Among the hospitals that did not respond, 86% had an equal visitation policy. This likely is due to the fact that such policies are now required by Medicare/Medicaid; therefore, not having such a policy violates federal standards. More facilities included only sexual orientation in their non-discrimination policy than both that and gender-identity. This fact encapsulates the increased acceptance of same-sex partnerships as well as the work that still needs to be done to include trans* individuals. Generally speaking, the HEI provides a fairly accurate snapshot of national attitudes towards these groups. In recent years, there have been huge improvements in inclusion of LGB individuals and now the focus is rightfully shifting towards trans* people who remain more marginalized. Though these statistics are no ideal, they show drastic improvement from even two years ago and give hope that in another two years, the majority of healthcare facilities in the US will fully comply with all best practices for LGBT patient-centered care.

The results from facilities’ responses to “additional best practices” they currently or plan to enforce most clearly reflect this. Specifically, substantial improvements were noted in the following areas:

  • Providing transgender-focused training to employees
  • Recording domestic partnerships
  • Providing training to remind employees that LGBT-status is confidential
  • Providing healthcare benefits to same-sex partners of employees
  • Having at least one health insurance plan covering medically necessary services to transgender employees

The HEI also profiles several leaders who represent the very best of LGBT patient-centered care. Lastly, they provide four recommendations for hospitals who did not achieve Leader status this year. These recommendations include updating non-discrimination and visitation policies to cover both sexual orientation and gender identity and communicate these inclusive policies on the facility’s website alongside Patient Bill of Rights, visiting hours, and on the career page.

This report tells us both that huge strides are being made within healthcare and that there is still more work to be done. The nearly two-fold increase in the number of hospitals who willingly participated, the large number of staff who received training, and the hundreds of facilities designated as leaders offer an inspiring look at the future of LGBT patient-care.

Other Sexual Health News This Week

Despite Legal Reprieve On Abortion, Some Texas Clinics Remain Closed (NPR)

Alaska Asks U.S. Top Court to Block Gay Marriage (Reuters) Meanwhile, Horne Concedes Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Applies to Arizona. (AZ Central)

Gender Identity Training in Neb. Schools Frustrates Some, Applauded by Others (Christian Science Monitor)

Tougher Police Tactics Stinging Sex Buyers (Seattile Times)

Task Force to Tackle Sexual Assaults on Campuses (WWL)

Important Dates

International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health 2015 Meeting, October 30.

CatalystCon East, November 4.

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) 2015 Conference, November 5.

Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium, November 7.

Supreme Court Sows Confusion Over Same-Sex Marriage

Sex Stories

By Kait Scalisi, MPH

The news was alight this week with on-again, off-again reports of states approving same-sex marriage following a U.S. Supreme Court decision on Monday.

First, SCOTUS refused to hear challenges to lower courts’ rulings that uphold the right to same-sex marriage in five states: Wisconsin, Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, and Virginia. This refusal meant that the lower courts’ decision to allow same-sex marriage held, and such couples could begin marrying. Additionally, six other states fall under the jurisdiction of these lower courts. This means same-sex marriage may soon be coming to Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Because the lower court’s ruling cover these additional six states, confusion reigned. A South Carolina judge began accepting applications for marriage licenses. The state’s Supreme Court quickly put an end to this, citing a desire to wait on an official ruling from a federal judge that strikes down the ban.

Kansas followed South Carolina’s initial lead, and same-sex couples in at least one Kansas county can now receive marriage licenses. Because Kansas does not have residency requirements for licenses, however, same-sex couples outside of the county can also travel there to obtain a marriage license.

In West Virginia, the governor and attorney general agreed to stop defending the state’s ban on same-sex marriages.

In North Carolina, the results were mixed. The attorney general agreed to not challenge removal of the state’s same-sex marriage ban. After a judge lifted delays in two cases challenging the state’s ban, two legislative leaders filed a motion that would delay or block removal of the ban.

Wyoming’s governor kept things simple and re-voiced his dedication to upholding the state’s ban.

Most confusing, however, was how SCOTUS’ decision affects Idaho and Nevada. Same-sex marriage bans in these states were struck down by an appellate court shortly after SCOTUS’ decision. However, Idaho soon filed a request for an appeal to this decision and SCOTUS agreed to review it. This blocked same-sex marriages from starting there. However, Idaho mistakenly included both its and Nevada’s case number in their request, which meant same-sex marriages in the latter state also got blocked. This was a complete accident, as Nevada had no plans to challenge the appellate court’s decision to allow same-sex marriages.

On a final note, and to make things even more interesting, a decision on challenges to same-sex marriage bans in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee is still being debated by the appellate court. There is no timeline for when this ruling will be released, and the decision will likely cause equal amounts of chaos.

Other Sexual Health News This Week

The National Association of County and City Health Officials’ launched the first module in its PrEP and Local Health Departments educational series.

Virginia Tech University Adds Gender Identity Protections (Think Progress)

Half of Patients with HIV Not Screened Regularly for HCV (Healio)

Va. Campus Sexual Assault Task Force Meets (Washington Post)

Ann Arbor Calls on State to Add Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity to Anti-Discrimination Law (MLive)

Important Dates

International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health 2015 Meeting, October 30.

CatalystCon East, November 4.

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) 2015 Conference, November 5.

Southern HIV and Alcohol Research Consortium, November 7.